<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If Money and Resources Follow Attention&#8230;..</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brenda-cooper.com/2009/04/20/if-money-and-resources-follow-attention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brenda-cooper.com/2009/04/20/if-money-and-resources-follow-attention/</link>
	<description>The Future, Science, and Science Fiction:</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 23:34:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: brenda</title>
		<link>http://www.brenda-cooper.com/2009/04/20/if-money-and-resources-follow-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-2392</link>
		<dc:creator>brenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brenda-cooper.com/?p=549#comment-2392</guid>
		<description>Hey - that&#039;s a nice post - I agree with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey &#8211; that&#8217;s a nice post &#8211; I agree with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brenda</title>
		<link>http://www.brenda-cooper.com/2009/04/20/if-money-and-resources-follow-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-2391</link>
		<dc:creator>brenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brenda-cooper.com/?p=549#comment-2391</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Jack!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jack!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack William Bell</title>
		<link>http://www.brenda-cooper.com/2009/04/20/if-money-and-resources-follow-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-2295</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack William Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brenda-cooper.com/?p=549#comment-2295</guid>
		<description>Also, &lt;a href=&quot;http://jackwilliambell.livejournal.com/tag/attention&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;apropos essay from 2006&lt;/a&gt;, by moi of course, which speaks of the &#039;attention economy&#039; of the web...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, <a href="http://jackwilliambell.livejournal.com/tag/attention" rel="nofollow">apropos essay from 2006</a>, by moi of course, which speaks of the &#8216;attention economy&#8217; of the web&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack William Bell</title>
		<link>http://www.brenda-cooper.com/2009/04/20/if-money-and-resources-follow-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-2294</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack William Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brenda-cooper.com/?p=549#comment-2294</guid>
		<description>That obscurity quote is a favorite of Cory Doctorow&#039;s and may have originated with him. He uses it often when discussing why it is better to have many people reading your work for free than a few people paying for the privilege. (AKA why DRM does nothing positive for the creative worker.)

It&#039;s funny how many things the early bloggers spent a lot of time bloviating about in 1998/99 (such as how pay walls would destroy any chances of print journalism moving onto the web in a serious way) have come to pass. And now the second generation blogosphere is re-iterating the same arguments dismissed as conceited nonsense ten years ago. Maybe the whatever is left of journalism and print publishing will pay attention this time.

Or not...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That obscurity quote is a favorite of Cory Doctorow&#8217;s and may have originated with him. He uses it often when discussing why it is better to have many people reading your work for free than a few people paying for the privilege. (AKA why DRM does nothing positive for the creative worker.)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny how many things the early bloggers spent a lot of time bloviating about in 1998/99 (such as how pay walls would destroy any chances of print journalism moving onto the web in a serious way) have come to pass. And now the second generation blogosphere is re-iterating the same arguments dismissed as conceited nonsense ten years ago. Maybe the whatever is left of journalism and print publishing will pay attention this time.</p>
<p>Or not&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
